Thanks to:
Natalia Hostrander
Richard Bemrose
Mark Charlton
Richard Stevens
Jim Williams
Frank Wortner
Felix Maurer
The general concensus was to upgrade to sendmail 8.9.x. I also got a
couple of the senders system had a problem not mine.
Original Question:
>I got this from a part time faculty member who was doing y2k testing on
his >system at his full time work. He was wondering if this indicates that
our >mail server and sendmail are not y2k compliant. The date that appears
to have >been returned from our system storm is: Date: Sat, 1 Jan 100
02:50:05 -0600 >(CST). I am running Tru64-UNIX 4.0d with patch kit 3. The
version of sendmail >is 8.8.7. Any ideas?
>
> Date: 1/1/00 3:50 AM
> From: root
> This is a message from a machine running SendMail here at farmdayta
> to Simpson's machine. For me, this message arrives at Simpson with the
> year 100, not 2000 as clock on this machine is set to.
>
>
> RFC822 header
> -----------------------------------
>
> Received: from linux01.farmdayta.com by storm.simpson.edu
>(8.8.7/1.1.20.3/20Nov98-0648AM)
> id MAA0000029229; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 12:12:21 -0500 (CDT)
> Received: (from root_at_localhost)
> by linux01.farmdayta.com (8.9.1/8.8.7) id CAA02245
> for johnscha_at_storm.simpson.edu; Sat, 1 Jan 2000 02:50:05 -0600
><root_at_linux01.farmdayta.com>
><200001010850.CAA02245_at_linux01.farmdayta.com>
> Subject: Y2K message 2
> To: johnscha_at_storm.simpson.edu
> Date: Sat, 1 Jan 100 02:50:05 -0600 (CST)
> Content-Type: text
> X-UIDL: 6c993b24e0ee36e6e34f5031511c452a
> Status: RO
Paul Crittenden
Computer System Manager
Simpson College
e-mail: crittend_at_simpson.edu
Y2K? Why not 3?
Received on Tue Aug 24 1999 - 16:01:55 NZST